Zara Weekly-Pay Claims Advance in Earlier Ruling

An earlier stage of the Zara wage-and-hour litigation involved claims that certain New York employees should have received weekly rather than biweekly wages. The original news entry described the claims moving forward.

Read More

• Zara settlement provides related source coverage or case background.
• New York Labor Law Section 191 sets out the state’s wage-payment timing requirements.
• Law 360 report provides related source coverage and case background.

What Were the Weekly-Pay Allegations?

Workers asserted that their duties qualified them for New York’s manual-worker weekly pay protections. Those allegations were disputed and should not be described as established violations.

What Did the Earlier Ruling Mean?

A ruling permitting claims to proceed allowed further litigation, but it wasn’t a finding that Zara owed the requested damages. The case also included claims involving overtime calculations for hourly retail employees.

What Happened Later in the Zara Litigation?

In May 2024, a federal judge approved a $1.25 million settlement resolving disputed wage-and-hour claims.