Healthcare Employees Granted Certification in Overtime Pay Dispute

Posted by: Brian Schaffer

A Connecticut-based home healthcare logistics company and a former employee agreed to conditionally certify a collective in a federal wage lawsuit focused on alleged unpaid off-the-clock work.

What Overtime Claim Is Proceeding Against CareCentrix?

The case against CareCentrix Inc. centers on claims that workers weren’t paid overtime for tasks completed outside regular shifts. A former patient advocate alleged that she performed unpaid work starting and closing computer programs before and after scheduled shifts.

What Off-the-Clock Computer Tasks Were Alleged?

Claims involving computer startup, login, and shutdown time are a recurring issue in hourly and remote-work settings when those tasks are required for the job.

Who May Be Included in the Collective Action?

The judge approved the case to proceed as a collective action covering current and former patient advocates employed by CareCentrix during the applicable period. Potential members should receive notice and an opportunity to opt in.

An inquiry doesn’t establish that a claim exists, guarantee that the firm can accept the matter, or create an attorney-client relationship. This page provides general information, not legal advice. Don’t send confidential or time-sensitive information through an online form. Prior results don’t guarantee a similar outcome.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What does conditional certification mean in an FLSA overtime case?

Conditional certification is an early procedural step that can allow notification to workers who may be similarly situated to the named plaintiff. It doesn’t decide that the employer violated the FLSA, and it isn’t a final determination that everyone who receives notice belongs in the case. Workers generally must affirmatively opt in to an FLSA collective action. The court can later revisit whether the participating employees are sufficiently similarly situated.

Can computer boot-up and login time be compensable for call-center employees?

Potentially. When employees must start computers, open required programs, authenticate into systems, or perform other tasks before they can begin their principal work, disputes can arise over whether that time is compensable. Courts examine the specific tasks, their relationship to the employee’s work, and other facts. The CareCentrix case described in the article concerns allegations that employees had to complete required computer-related activities before they could record their time.

Does an employer have to pay for only a few minutes of required computer startup time?

Short periods can still matter when they are compensable and occur regularly. Repeated minutes before shifts, after shifts, or around unpaid meal periods can accumulate over a workweek and potentially affect overtime. Whether a particular amount of time is legally compensable is fact-specific, and courts have addressed arguments about very small amounts of time in different contexts. Accurate records of login times, phone-system availability, schedules, and time punches can be important.

Who has to opt in to an FLSA collective action?

Workers who want to participate in an FLSA collective action generally must file a written consent to join; they aren’t automatically included merely because they fit the group description. Court-authorized notice typically explains the eligible group, deadline, and procedure. Joining can affect a worker’s rights and the claims being pursued, so the notice should be read carefully. This opt-in structure differs from many Rule 23 class actions, where qualifying members are generally included unless they opt out.

CONTACT FITAPELLI & SCHAFFER LLP

Thank you! Your email has been delivered.

Fitapelli & Schaffer, LLP - Employment Lawyers
28 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10005
(212) 300-0375
(212) 481-1333

FREE CONSULTATION

212.300.0375